Supreme Court weighs Navajo Nation's water rights in Colorado River dispute.

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. Navajo Nation, a case revolving around whether the U.S. government is obligated to fulfill Native American reservations’ water needs. The Navajo Nation argues that an 1868 treaty guarantees their agricultural needs, which includes water rights. The U.S. argued that treaty obligations did not include an obligation to develop specific water infrastructure. The case also involves the allocation of rights to the Colorado River between the seven states in the river’s basin. The stakes are particularly high for Indigenous people in the region, considering the ongoing drought in the western U.S.
Topics:nation#native-american-reservations#navajo-nation#politics#supreme-court#water-rights#winters-doctrine
- Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Navajo Nation water rights The Hill
- Supreme Court wrestles with Navajo Nation water rights dispute NBC News
- Feds want justices to end Navajo fight for Colorado River water KSL.com
- The Supreme Court hears a case with implications for the shrinking Colorado River WUSF Public Media
- Supreme Court hears case on Navajo Nation water dispute MSNBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
85%
677 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Hill