"Supreme Court Justices Face Criticism and Tensions in COVID Censorship and Social Media Cases"

TL;DR Summary
During the "Murthy v. Missouri" oral arguments, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's comments about the First Amendment potentially "hamstringing" the government in COVID censorship drew criticism from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan and others, who argued that such views could lead to censorship of opposing viewpoints. The case raises questions about the government's role in pressuring social media platforms to suppress certain speech during the pandemic, with some expressing concerns about potential government coercion and the impact on free speech.
Topics:nation#covid-censorship#first-amendment#government-coercion#justice-ketanji-brown-jackson#politics#supreme-court
- Justice Jackson lambasted for 'concern' 1st Amendment could 'hamstring government' in COVID censorship hearing Fox News
- Justice Jackson ripped for worrying about the First Amendment 'hamstringing' government: 'Literally the point' Fox News
- The Supreme Court's conservatives are annoyed at the 5th Circuit. Slate
- Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh loses patience with the judiciary’s far right Vox.com
- Supreme Court seems favorable to Biden administration over efforts to combat social media posts NBC Washington
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
90%
763 → 80 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News