"Legal Battle Erupts: Bragg vs. Jordan Over Anti-Trump Interference"

1 min read
Source: POLITICO
"Legal Battle Erupts: Bragg vs. Jordan Over Anti-Trump Interference"
Photo: POLITICO
TL;DR Summary

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is using a legal strategy to defy federal subpoenas by invoking state sovereignty, which he previously used while working in the New York attorney general's office. Bragg's lawsuit against Rep. Jim Jordan and his House Judiciary Committee seeks to block a subpoena seeking testimony from a former assistant DA who criticized aspects of his Trump investigation. The conflict raises delicate questions about the balance of power between Congress and the states. Bragg's lawsuit replicates many of the arguments made in a 2016 and 2017 subpoena fight over a climate change investigation.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

0

Time Saved

4 min

vs 5 min read

Condensed

89%

86596 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on POLITICO