Constitutionality of Jack Smith's Appointment Challenged in Supreme Court

Former Attorney General Ed Meese, along with law professors Steven G. Calabresi and Gary S. Lawson, filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that Special Counsel Jack Smith's appointment by Attorney General Merrick Garland is unconstitutional. They claim that Smith, a private citizen, lacks the authority to represent the United States in the Supreme Court and that his appointment violates the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. They argue that Smith's petition should be denied, citing the absence of statutory authority and the requirement for presidential appointment and senatorial confirmation for such a position. Smith had requested expedited consideration of former President Donald Trump's case regarding presidential immunity for his actions on January 6, 2021.
- Special counsel in Trump case unconstitutional, former Reagan AG says Fox News
- Jack Smith Lacks Standing to File in the Supreme Court Because He is Only a Private Citizen Reason
- Was Jack Smith's appointment unconstitutional? He has no more authority than Taylor Swift, amicus brief argues ABA Journal
- Republicans try to "sink" Jack Smith in Supreme Court with Taylor Swift Newsweek
- 'Remarkable' Jack Smith would appeal his win: Alan Dershowitz Fox Business
Reading Insights
0
1
3 min
vs 4 min read
82%
637 → 112 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News