Clarence Thomas Criticizes Brown v. Board of Education Decision

TL;DR Summary
Justice Clarence Thomas criticized the Supreme Court's use of judicial power in the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision while concurring in a recent ruling that upheld a GOP-drawn redistricting map in South Carolina. Thomas argued that federal courts should not be involved in drawing voting districts and that the Constitution prohibits all forms of race-based discrimination. The court's 6-3 decision emphasized the need to distinguish between race and politics in redistricting challenges.
Topics:nation#brown-v-board-of-education#clarence-thomas#politics#racial-gerrymandering#redistricting#supreme-court
- Clarence Thomas takes aim at 'judicial power' in landmark Brown v Board of Education decision Fox News
- Clarence Thomas Criticizes Brown V. Board Of Education Decision While Ruling In Racial Gerrymandering Case, Black Twitter Calls Him 'Uncle Ruckus' Yahoo! Voices
- Clarence Thomas criticizes Brown v. Board of Education. It comes at an awkward moment USA TODAY
- Clarence Thomas on Brown v. Board: Pernicious Media Distortions National Review
- Clarence Thomas Says Brown V. Board of Education Went Too Far The Root
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
94%
1,145 → 74 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News