"Challenges and Controversies Surrounding Trump's Ballot Eligibility"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson, a case questioning whether Colorado was right to remove Trump from the ballot due to his role in the January 6 insurrection. Trump's legal arguments, including the claim that the president is not an "officer of the United States," are weak and unlikely to sway the Court. His lawyers also attempt to revive a dangerous legal argument previously rejected by the Court. Despite the 6-3 Republican supermajority, it remains uncertain how the justices will rule.
- Trump's legal arguments for staying on the ballot are embarrassingly weak Vox.com
- How obscure language in the Constitution rose to ensnare Trump The Associated Press
- Should Justice Thomas recuse in 14th Amendment case because of wife's Jan. 6 role? ABC News
- Trump's one last plea to the Supreme Court ahead of the Colorado ballot hearing MSNBC
- Why some want Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse from Trump ballot case The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
16 min
vs 16 min read
Condensed
97%
3,194 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox.com