"Supreme Court Grapples with Social Media and Free Speech in Landmark Cases"

1 min read
Source: The Washington Post
"Supreme Court Grapples with Social Media and Free Speech in Landmark Cases"
Photo: The Washington Post
TL;DR Summary

Politicians from both parties have been leveraging their relationships with social media companies to influence content moderation decisions, a practice known as "jawboning." The Supreme Court is set to decide whether such attempts violate the First Amendment in a landmark case, Murthy v. Missouri. The case was initiated by Republican attorneys general, alleging that the Biden administration's communications with platforms urging the removal of posts containing misinformation about the pandemic and elections amounted to illegal censorship. The case has sparked debate about the constitutional bounds of government influence on social media content and the need for clearer rules around government actors' interactions with tech companies.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

9 min

vs 10 min read

Condensed

94%

1,860105 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The Washington Post