Federal Courts Crack Down on "Judge Shopping" Practices

TL;DR Summary
Federal courts have implemented a new policy to curb "judge shopping," the practice of filing lawsuits in front of sympathetic judges, particularly in cases affecting an entire state or the country. This move comes after heightened attention on the issue following a controversial ruling on abortion medication. The policy aims to randomly assign judges to such cases, addressing concerns raised by senators and the Biden administration. The Supreme Court has put the abortion medication ruling on hold and will hear arguments on it later this month.
Topics:nation#abortion-medication#federal-courts#judge-shopping#judicial-conference#lawsuits#legal-reform
- Federal courts move to restrict 'judge shopping,' which got attention after abortion medication case The Associated Press
- The federal courts’ new “judge shopping” rules are a major blow to Republicans Vox.com
- U.S. courts require random judge assignments to avoid 'judge shopping' The Washington Post
- Federal courts move against 'judge-shopping' - POLITICO POLITICO
- Federal courts make it harder to 'judge-shop' as was done in abortion pill case NBC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
76%
365 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Associated Press