Supreme Court tackles unusual trademark cases involving whiskey, dog toys, and poop.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in a case involving a humorous dog toy maker and American whiskey producer Jack Daniel's. The case centers on a chew toy that resembles a bottle of Jack Daniel's whiskey but is spoofed as "Bad Spaniels" with the suggestion that its contents are pet waste. Jack Daniel's claims the toy's design causes confusion and dilutes the quality of its brand, while VIP Products insists the spoof is obvious and protected by the First Amendment. The justices considered what legal test should decide when a trademark has been infringed and whether VIP Products' toy had done so.
- Supreme Court hears arguments on whiskey bottles, dog toys, pornography and poop ABC News
- Supreme Court hears trademark case involving Jack Daniel's and dog toys PBS NewsHour
- Jack Daniel's wants Supreme Court to save its good name from a chewy dog toy NPR
- Jack Daniel's and dog toy in Supreme Court showdown BBC
- The Supreme Court hears a surprisingly difficult case about poop jokes, in Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Vox.com
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
83%
605 → 102 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on ABC News