Supreme Court Faces Key Cases on LGBTQ Rights and Conversion Therapy
TL;DR Summary
The article criticizes Supreme Court Justices Alito and Barrett for undermining the principle of originalism by dismissing expert consensus in favor of ideological and political motives, highlighting a hypocrisy in their reliance on professional opinion when it suits their outcomes, despite their criticism of such consensus in other contexts.
Topics:nation#justice-alito#justice-barrett#law-and-politics#medical-consensus#originalism#supreme-court
- Republican Supreme Court Justices Unwittingly Undermine Originalism Daily Kos
- A discredited therapy for gay and trans youth is at the center of a Supreme Court case. Here’s what to know CNN
- A Consequential Supreme Court Term Begins With a Conversion Therapy Case The New York Times
- With One Damning Question, Ketanji Brown Jackson Defined the Supreme Court’s New Term Slate
- Supreme Court skeptical of state bans on conversion therapy aimed at LGBTQ kids NBC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
2 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
87%
388 → 49 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Daily Kos