"Supreme Court Considers Bump Stocks and Machine Guns in Landmark Case"

TL;DR Summary
During a Supreme Court argument, Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed sympathy for upholding the ban on "bump stocks," devices that convert semiautomatic weapons into fully automatic ones. The case, known as Garland v. Cargill, revolves around the interpretation of federal law banning "machineguns" and whether it encompasses bump stocks. The oral argument suggests that the ban on bump stocks will likely be upheld, with Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts showing potential support for the government's position.
- Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett could save us from legalized machine guns Vox.com
- Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments over bump stocks and machine guns CNN
- US Supreme Court Hears 'Bump Stocks' Gun Case Barron's
- What are bump stocks? US Supreme Court weighs Trump-era ban on gun attachments BBC.com
- [Garland v. Cargill] Oral Argument C-SPAN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
95%
1,696 → 77 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox.com