"Federal Courts Crack Down on 'Judge Shopping' Tactics"
TL;DR Summary
The Judicial Conference of the United States has announced a new policy requiring random assignment of judges in civil cases with statewide or national implications to address concerns about "judge shopping." This move aims to promote impartiality and public confidence in the federal judiciary. The issue gained attention after controversial cases were filed in single-judge divisions. Meanwhile, the Judicial Conference is still reviewing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's financial reporting practices following accusations of violating federal ethics laws.
Topics:nation#clarence-thomas#federal-judiciary#judge-shopping#judicial-conference#law-and-justice#random-judge-assignments
- U.S. courts require random judge assignments to avoid 'judge shopping' The Washington Post
- The federal courts’ new “judge shopping” rules are a major blow to Republicans Vox.com
- New Federal Judiciary Rule Will Limit 'Forum Shopping' by Plaintiffs The New York Times
- Federal courts move to restrict 'judge shopping,' which got attention after abortion medication case Yahoo! Voices
- Federal judiciary clamps down on ‘judge-shopping’ tactics that have helped Texas block Biden and liberal policies CNN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
89%
725 → 78 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post