Peer-reviewed claim falsely labels researcher as sex robot expert

TL;DR Summary
A researcher was mistakenly listed as an expert on sex robots in a published paper, which was later retracted due to data inaccuracies and inappropriate search methods, highlighting issues of research misconduct and the importance of accurate bibliometric analysis.
Topics:health#academic-integrity#bibliometric-analysis#research-misconduct#retraction#science-and-research#sex-robots
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
95%
779 → 39 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Retraction Watch