Supreme Court Limits Fair Use for Andy Warhol's Prince Print Series.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Andy Warhol's use of a photographer's portrait of Prince for a series of pop-art images was not protected by fair use, limiting the reach of the defense to copyright infringement claims. The court found that the photographer's "original works, like those of other photographers, are entitled to copyright protection, even against famous artists" like Warhol. The decision tests the reach of the defense and how courts should evaluate if works based on others are meaningfully transformative enough to qualify as a different piece.
- Andy Warhol Ruling Limits Fair Use for Copyrighted Images, With Far-Reaching Hollywood Implications Hollywood Reporter
- Supreme Court rules Andy Warhol violated copyright of Prince photo CBS Pittsburgh
- Ruling Against Warhol Shouldn't Hurt Artists. But It Might. The New York Times
- Elena Kagan Uses Footnote To Unleash Surprise Sotomayor Diss Track Above the Law
- Andy Warhol Prince Print Series U.S. Supreme Court HYPEBEAST
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
93%
1,364 → 90 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Hollywood Reporter