Supreme Court Rules Against Warhol in Prince Copyright Case.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Andy Warhol infringed on the copyright of photographer Lynn Goldsmith when he used her original black-and-white portrait of the late singer Prince to create a series of 16 silkscreen prints. The court rejected the Andy Warhol Foundation’s claim that the silkscreens were “transformative” enough to justify fair use. The decision sets a precedent for copyright protections and fair use limitations. The case revolved around one image in particular from Warhol’s Prince series, “Orange Prince.”
- Supreme Court Rules Against Warhol Foundation in Copyright Case Hyperallergic
- Ruling Against Warhol Shouldn't Hurt Artists. But It Might. The New York Times
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in Prince portrait copyright dispute KOMO News
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol's estate in copyright dispute over Prince image CBS News
- Supreme Court rules Andy Warhol violated copyright of Prince photo CBS Pittsburgh
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
89%
734 → 81 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Hyperallergic