UK Supreme Court: AI Cannot be Named as Patent 'Inventor'

TL;DR Summary
The UK Supreme Court has ruled that AI cannot be named as an inventor, stating that only humans or companies can be considered creators. The decision aligns with a similar ruling in the US, where the US Patent and Trademark Office denied a petition from Stephen Thaler, the founder of the AI system DABUS, to claim AI as an inventor. Thaler had sought to register DABUS as the inventor of a food container and a flashing light beacon, but the UK Intellectual Property Office rejected the request. The case raises questions about how to deal with AI-generated material and whether it can be protected under the law.
- UK Supreme Court rules AI is not an inventor The Verge
- AI cannot be patent 'inventor', UK Supreme Court rules in landmark case Reuters
- AI cannot be named as an 'inventor,' top UK court says in patent dispute CNBC
- AI machine cannot be called an inventor, rules UK court Financial Times
- AI cannot be named as patent ‘inventor’, UK supreme court rules The Guardian
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
63%
291 → 107 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Verge