Lawyers sanctioned for citing ChatGPT's fake cases in court.

TL;DR Summary
Attorneys in New York who cited fake cases created by OpenAI's ChatGPT in their court filings have been sanctioned by a judge. The lawyers submitted non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by the AI tool, then continued to stand by the fake opinions after judicial orders called their existence into question. The judge ordered each attorney to pay a $5,000 fine to the court, notify their client, and notify each real judge falsely identified as the author of the cited fake cases. The judge dismissed the plaintiff's injury claim against Avianca because more than two years had passed between the injury and the lawsuit.
- Lawyers who cited fake cases hallucinated by ChatGPT must pay The Register
- Sanctions Issued in Case Where Lawyers Cited ChatGPT-Hallucinated Precedents Reason
- ChatGPT Lawyers Get Slap On The Wrist From Court. But Infamy Is Forever. Above the Law
- Lawyers submitted bogus case law created by ChatGPT. A judge fined them $5000 The Seattle Times
- Judge Sanctions Lawyers Who Filed Fake ChatGPT Legal Research The Wall Street Journal
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
88%
921 → 107 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Register