Lawyer faces penalty for citing AI-generated fake cases in court.

TL;DR Summary
A lawyer, Steven A. Schwartz, may face sanctions for submitting a brief filled with fake judicial opinions and legal citations, all generated by ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence program. Schwartz apologized and said he had made a "deeply regrettable mistake." The incident has sparked a debate about the dangers of relying on AI tools in legal practice. The case involved a man who sued an airline, but the cases cited in his brief were not real. Schwartz and his law firm have asked the judge not to impose sanctions, saying they have already learned their lesson.
- Lawyer Who Used ChatGPT Faces Penalty for Made Up Citations The New York Times
- Lawyer Used ChatGPT In Court—And Cited Fake Cases. A Judge Is Considering Sanctions Forbes
- Argument Against Sanctions for Lawyer's Filing of Motion That Contained AI-Hallucinated Cases Reason
- Who's to Blame for ‘Bogus’ ChatGPT Legal Brief?: The Morning Minute Law.com
- Lawyers Who Used ChatGPT To Dummy Up Cases Throw Themselves On The Mercy Of The Court Above the Law
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
84%
601 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times