Tulsi Gabbard released documents claiming a conspiracy by Obama officials to manufacture Russia interference in the 2016 election, but reviews and investigations show her claims are misleading and do not contradict the established conclusion that Russia interfered to help Trump, with no evidence of vote tampering or election outcome alteration.
A British judge has ordered former President Donald Trump to pay $382,000 in legal fees to Orbis Business Intelligence, the company he unsuccessfully sued over the "Steele Dossier." The judge dismissed Trump's suit last month, stating it was "bound to fail." The total costs Trump must pay could increase, as Orbis has requested around $760,000. The dossier, prepared for opposition research, contained allegations about Trump's relationship with Russia, which he strongly denied.
Former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay $382,000 in legal fees to Orbis Business Intelligence, founded by former British spy Christopher Steele, after losing a lawsuit over the publication of the so-called Steele dossier. The dossier, which contained unverified and salacious allegations about Trump's conduct, was at the center of a legal battle in the UK, where Trump claimed it had damaged his reputation. However, a London judge threw out the case, ruling that it was bound to fail. This adds to Trump's legal woes as he faces multiple criminal and civil cases in the US.
London's High Court dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against Orbis Business Intelligence over the controversial Steele Dossier, which alleged Trump's involvement in Russian bribery and "perverted" sex acts. The judge ruled that Trump's claim for damages was bound to fail due to a six-year limitations period and that there were no compelling reasons to allow the claim to proceed. The dossier, compiled by former MI6 agent Christopher Steele, had been a source of controversy since its publication in 2017, and Trump's lawsuit was seen as a final attempt to rehabilitate his reputation.
A London court has dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against Christopher Steele, the former British spy behind the infamous dossier alleging ties between Trump and Russia. The lawsuit was filed in 2020, with Trump claiming that Steele had defamed him in the dossier. However, the court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction over the case, leading to its dismissal.
A British judge has dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against Orbis Business Intelligence over the "Steele dossier," which contained unverified claims about Trump's ties to Russia and alleged "perverted sexual acts" in Russia. The judge ruled that there were no compelling reasons for the claim to proceed to trial, noting that Trump had waited too long to address his grievances. Trump alleged that the dossier violated his personal data protection rights and caused personal and reputational damage, but the judge found that he had allowed many years to elapse without attempting to vindicate his reputation.
A British court has dismissed Donald Trump's damages lawsuit against Orbis Business Intelligence over allegations of "perverted" sexual acts and Russian bribes, ruling that the claim was filed too late and would likely fail. The lawsuit related to the Steele Dossier's unfounded claims about Trump's ties to Russia and alleged sexual activities. The judge stated that there were no compelling reasons for the claim to proceed to trial and that Trump had allowed too much time to elapse since he was first made aware of the dossier.
The UK High Court has dismissed Donald Trump's attempt to sue the company run by former MI6 officer Christopher Steele over the salacious dossier linking him to Russia, citing that the claim had not been brought within the six-year limitation period. The dossier, containing unproven allegations about Trump's ties to Russia, was compiled by Steele and leaked just before Trump's presidency. Trump alleged that the dossier contained inaccurate allegations and breached his data protection rights, but the court ruled against his claim.
A judge in London has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former U.S. President Donald Trump against Orbis Business Intelligence, the firm founded by ex-British spy Christopher Steele, over the controversial dossier containing unverified allegations. The judge ruled that there were no compelling reasons for the claim to proceed to trial and that Trump had waited too long to file the lawsuit. This comes as Trump faces legal challenges on both sides of the Atlantic, including a civil fraud trial in New York and multiple criminal cases.
Former President Donald Trump's mention of the infamous "golden showers" allegation from the Steele Dossier during a rally has sparked reactions on social media. The dossier, created by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, contained unverified claims about Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Trump and his representatives have consistently denied the allegation, and intelligence experts have largely dismissed its credibility. Trump's reference to the allegation at the rally has reignited discussions and raised eyebrows among social media users.
Fox News analyst Juan Williams dismissed GOP lawmakers' claims of whistleblowers having damning evidence on the Bidens, calling it a bunch of rumors and innuendo with no hard evidence. Williams compared the allegations to the Democrats' flawed Steele dossier. GOP lawmakers pushed a 2017 WhatsApp message purportedly showing Hunter Biden pressuring a Chinese business associate to act on a deal while wielding Joe Biden's influence. The Justice Department concluded a five-year investigation of Hunter Biden last week that will likely result in no jail time.
CNN anchor Jake Tapper, who was one of the faces of CNN's Russiagate coverage, called the Durham Report "devastating" to the FBI and exonerating to former President Donald Trump. Tapper was one of the first journalists to report on the existence of the Steele dossier, which has since been widely discredited. The Durham Report confirmed that the Russia investigation was based on unsubstantiated and politicized origins, and Tapper's comments are significant as he was in some ways the face of CNN's Russiagate coverage.
Special counsel John Durham's report revealed that Charles Dolan, a PR executive with close ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, was likely the source of the "pee tape" claim in the Steele Dossier report. The report also criticized the FBI for relying on Igor Danchenko, who had a "troubling history" and was the linchpin to the uncorroborated allegations contained in the Steele reports. Despite concerns, the FBI continued to employ Danchenko as a confidential informant for more than three years, paying him a total of $220,000.
Special counsel John Durham concluded that the FBI should never have launched a full investigation into connections between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia during the 2016 election, according to a report compiled over three years. Durham’s report also states that the FBI used “raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence,” to launch the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation into Trump and Russia but used a different standard when weighing concerns about alleged election interference regarding Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Durham did not recommend any new charges against individuals or “wholesale changes” about how the FBI handles politically charged investigations, despite strongly criticizing the agency’s behavior.