Ghislaine Maxwell has filed a petition to vacate her sex crime conviction, citing new evidence including juror bias and suppressed testimony that could undermine her case, though such petitions are rarely successful. The petition coincides with a deadline for the release of related investigative files.
The Menendez brothers are exploring a habeas petition as a potential legal pathway to challenge their convictions, citing new evidence of past abuse and assault that could lead to a new trial or reduced sentences, despite their recent parole denial.
Rex Heuermann, already accused of killing four sex workers and dumping their bodies on Long Island's Gilgo Beach, has been indicted for the murders of two more women. New evidence, including a "planning document" found on his computer, details his methodical approach to the killings. Heuermann, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, faces additional second-degree murder charges. Investigators have linked him to the crimes through DNA evidence and other forensic findings.
Lyle and Erik Menendez, convicted of killing their parents in 1989, claim they did so out of fear and self-defense due to a lifetime of abuse. New evidence, including a letter and new allegations, supports their claims. The focus of the case has shifted to whether their convictions will stand. The brothers' defense argues that the new evidence corroborates their claims and lessens their culpability, potentially warranting a new trial. However, prosecutors maintain that the evidence proves the killings were premeditated and motivated by money, not self-defense.
Lyle and Erik Menendez, who have been imprisoned for over three decades for the murder of their parents, are hoping that new evidence, including a letter and a sworn affidavit, will lead to the reopening of their case. Their lawyer argues that the evidence supports their claims of lifelong abuse and lessens their culpability, suggesting that they should have been convicted of manslaughter instead of first-degree murder. The Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office is investigating the claims, and a judge's decision is pending.
Texas inmate Ivan Cantu was executed for a double murder he insisted he didn't commit, maintaining his innocence until his death. Convicted in 2001 for the killings of his cousin and his cousin's girlfriend, Cantu's attorney claimed to have gathered new evidence proving his innocence, but an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was not submitted before the execution. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had previously found the new evidence "not credible." The next execution in Texas is scheduled for the summer.
Texas inmate Ivan Cantu, facing execution for a 2000 fatal shooting, claims new evidence points to his innocence, including false testimony and questionable evidence. Despite efforts to delay the execution, including support from faith leaders, celebrities, and lawmakers, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Cantu's request to stay the execution. The case has garnered attention due to doubts raised by jurors and new witness statements. The district attorney maintains that evidence presented at trial proved Cantu's guilt, while Cantu's attorney argues that the new evidence impugns the integrity of the state's case for guilt. If the execution proceeds, it would be the first in Texas this year.
A juror from Scott Peterson's murder trial stated that the killer's attempt to blame his wife's murder on a nearby burglary has already been discredited by police. Peterson's attorneys are seeking items from the burglary investigation to help exonerate him, but the juror noted that the police had found no connection between the two crimes. The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken up Peterson's case and is requesting DNA testing of evidence from the original trial, while the juror expressed openness to new evidence potentially proving Peterson's innocence.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken up the case of Scott Peterson, who was sentenced to death for the murder of his pregnant wife 21 years ago. The project argues that new evidence supports Peterson's claim of innocence and raises questions about who abducted and killed his wife. Peterson has maintained his innocence and claimed he received an unfair trial. The case, which gripped America, involved Peterson's wife, Laci Peterson, who went missing in 2002. Despite the California supreme court overturning his death sentence in 2020, Peterson was resentenced to life without parole. The project is seeking evidence from the trial that was not provided to the defense at the time.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken on the case of Scott Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 of murdering his pregnant wife. They are seeking new evidence from the original trial and investigating his claim of innocence. Peterson's attorneys have filed a petition alleging juror misconduct and presented "new evidence" to support his innocence, including a burglary near the Peterson home at the time of his wife's disappearance. The Innocence Project has requested to review police interviews and conduct DNA tests on evidence. Peterson's sister-in-law sees this as a chance for a new trial or his release, while his 2022 request for a new trial was denied.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken up the case of convicted murderer Scott Peterson, claiming that new evidence could exonerate him in the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, more than two decades ago. They are seeking various items and documents related to the case, while the district attorney's office has questioned the project's assertions. Peterson has maintained his innocence, and a California judge previously denied his bid for a new trial in 2022.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project is investigating the case of Scott Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 of murdering his wife, Laci Peterson, and their unborn son. Peterson's attorney confirmed that the organization is looking into his claim of innocence, following his unsuccessful bid for a new trial based on juror misconduct. Peterson, who is serving a life sentence without parole, maintains that he did not commit the murders, and his legal team claims to have new evidence supporting his innocence.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project is seeking to clear Scott Peterson of the murder of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, citing newly discovered evidence in court filings. The organization is calling for a new review of all evidence and tips, as well as a new trial. The filings focus on a burglary near the Petersons' home, a torched van with a blood-stained mattress, and sightings of a pregnant woman resembling Laci. Scott Peterson has maintained his innocence, stating he had nothing to do with the disappearance and deaths of his wife and son.
The Los Angeles Innocence Project has taken on Scott Peterson's case, seeking new evidence to prove his innocence in the murder of his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson. Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 and resentenced to life in prison in 2021, filed a petition claiming juror misconduct and presenting "new evidence." His legal team alleges that a juror, Richelle Nice, concealed personal details during the trial. The organization is investigating Peterson's claim of actual innocence and aims to eventually overturn his conviction.
The LA Innocence Project has taken up the case of convicted wife killer Scott Peterson, seeking new evidence from the original trial. Peterson, who was convicted in 2004 of killing his pregnant wife and unborn son, has maintained his innocence and alleged jury misconduct. His death sentence was overturned in 2020, and he was resentenced to life in prison without parole in 2021. The case continues to develop as new court filings are made.