Tag

Mirror Group

All articles tagged with #mirror group

legal-royalty1 year ago

"Prince Harry's Phone Hacking Settlement Sparks Piers Morgan Clash"

Prince Harry has settled a phone hacking lawsuit with the Mirror Group for £400,000, criticizing former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan and urging a criminal investigation into the tabloid. The settlement covers legal costs and damages awarded in a ruling that found the group guilty of unlawful information gathering tactics. Harry's statement called out Morgan's contempt for the court's ruling and ongoing attacks, while the Mirror Group expressed satisfaction with the agreement. The case centered around 33 articles published between 1995 and 2011, with Harry also involved in similar lawsuits against other media outlets.

royalty2 years ago

Prince Harry's Court Victory: A Landmark in Tabloid Misconduct

Prince Harry has achieved a significant legal victory in his phone hacking case against the Mirror group, earning £140,600 in damages and potentially sparking a criminal inquiry. This win not only restores his reputation but also signifies a personal and ethical triumph for the prince. Despite his privileged background, Harry's fight for justice and his aim to reform the British media have garnered respect, even from sectors of the press that previously criticized him.

law-and-crime2 years ago

Prince Harry's Phone Hacking Ruling Marks Landmark Moment for British Tabloid Misconduct

London's police will carefully consider the court ruling that found Prince Harry to be a victim of phone hacking and other unlawful acts by Mirror Group journalists, with the knowledge of their editors. The Duke of Sussex was awarded £140,600 ($178,000) in damages. While there is no ongoing investigation, Prince Harry has been vocal about his mission to hold the British press accountable for their actions. The court ruling implicated high-profile broadcaster Piers Morgan, who denies any knowledge of phone hacking during his time as editor of the Daily Mirror.

legal2 years ago

Prince Harry Triumphs in Landmark Phone Hacking Lawsuit Against UK Tabloid

Prince Harry has won a partial victory in his phone hacking claim against the Mirror Group, with a judge ruling that there was "extensive" hacking and that 15 out of 33 news articles submitted by Harry were the result of accessing his voicemail. The court awarded Harry £140,600 ($180,000) in damages. The judge stated that phone hacking was widespread and habitual at the Mirror Group, with senior managers aware of and covering up the practice. Harry called for criminal charges to be brought against the publisher and for an investigation to be launched. Mirror Group Newspapers apologized for historical wrongdoing. Piers Morgan, former editor of the Daily Mirror, has not yet commented on the judgment. This is the first of several lawsuits Harry has brought against British tabloids.

royalty2 years ago

The Complicated Persona of Prince Harry: A Media Analysis.

Prince Harry has denounced "disturbing" stories in the Mirror Group's U.K. titles, but has revealed private details about members of his family, including his niece Princess Charlotte, in his best-selling book. The memoir was the fastest selling in history and its dramatic revelations reached a global audience of millions via news stories and social media posts, in addition to the record-breaking sales figures. His words, therefore, may well have reached an audience far larger than the U.K.- focused newspapers he is criticizing.

law2 years ago

Prince Harry's Legal Battles and Royal Return Amidst Tensions and Accusations.

Prince Harry's legal claim against the Mirror Group of newspapers for unlawful activities to gather stories about him between 1991 and 2011 is being criticized by the publisher's lawyer, who says evidence of phone hacking allegations is "slim to utterly non-existent." Harry is one of many high-profile figures suing the Mirror Group for alleged phone hacking, deception, and other illicit means of obtaining stories. He is also suing publishers of the Daily Mail and The Sun for similar past alleged offenses and the British Home Office over the level of taxpayer-funded personal security he believes he is entitled to claim.