Tag

Impact Fees

All articles tagged with #impact fees

legal-politics1 year ago

Supreme Court Rulings Shake Up Property Rights and Legislative Powers

The Supreme Court ruled that developers and home builders in California may challenge impact fees imposed by cities and counties for public improvements, potentially leading to the construction of more affordable housing. The decision could have wide impact in California, where local governments increasingly rely on impact fees to finance projects. The ruling opens the door for challenges to these fees as an unconstitutional taking of private property, but does not specify when such fees become unfair and unconstitutional. The case will now go back to the California courts, and the decision is seen as a significant victory for property rights.

law-and-justice1 year ago

"Supreme Court's Cautionary Rulings and Victories for Landowners and Small Businesses"

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, largely siding with George Sheetz in his challenge against a traffic impact mitigation fee as unconstitutional. The ruling cautioned against extending its implications too far, emphasizing that it applies only to the specific circumstances of the case. The decision does not address broader questions about permit conditions and compensable takings, leaving room for further litigation and interpretation.

legal2 years ago

"Supreme Court Ruling's Impact on California Housing and Civil Rights"

The Supreme Court is considering a case that could have significant implications for housing in California, as it will determine the extent to which cities and counties can impose impact fees on new construction projects to offset the strain on local infrastructure. The case involves a retiree in Placerville who was charged a $23,420 building fee, leading to a legal battle over the justification for such fees. The decision could impact housing costs and local government budgets, with potential consequences for housing development and revenue-raising policies.