The Ethical Dilemma of Ceasing War without 'Total Victory'

TL;DR Summary
The article discusses the morality of ending wars short of "total victory" and draws comparisons between Israel's war in Gaza and historical conflicts. The authors argue that pursuing total victory at any cost, including the destruction of civilian lives, is morally wrong. They criticize Israel's approach in Gaza, which they believe has not shown restraint or respect for enemy civilians. The article calls for a reconsideration of the war aim of destroying Hamas and emphasizes the need for humanitarian aid and an independent state for Palestinians.
- The morality of ending war short of 'total victory' Responsible Statecraft
- Israel-Gaza war: Does the West have the power to stop Israel? | UpFront Al Jazeera English
- UN Human Rights Office - OPT: The Israeli Forces are inflicting heavy and intense bombardments - occupied Palestinian territory ReliefWeb
- How the collapse of western moral values is fuelling Israel's genocide in Gaza Middle East Eye
- Two sets of innocents overlooked in Israel-Hamas conflict News-Leader
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
94%
1,374 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Responsible Statecraft