The DoD's 2026 National Defense Strategy: Swagger Without Substantive Plan

TL;DR Summary
Mark Hertling argues the 2026 National Defense Strategy is more political rhetoric than a usable plan: it substitutes swagger for analytical rigor, and its four lines of effort (homeland defense, Indo-Pacific deterrence, alliances, and industrial base) lack clear prioritization or credible execution. A true strategy should translate goals into budgets, force design, readiness, and concrete ally engagement, rather than a wish list that relies on untested assumptions and grand assertions.
Topics:world#alliances#defense#defense-industrial-base#indo-pacific-deterrence#national-defense-strategy#strategic-realism
- The Department of Defense’s ‘Strategy’ Is More Like a Wish List The Bulwark
- Eight takeaways from the Pentagon's Donroe-inspired defense strategy Axios
- Pentagon warns future wars may hit US soil as 'direct military threats' grow Fox News
- Pentagon Official Praises Seoul as US Eyes Less Military Support Bloomberg
- Trump’s national defense strategy is unlike anything that’s come before it Defense One
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
14
Time Saved
38 min
vs 38 min read
Condensed
99%
7,572 → 70 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Bulwark