"Trump's Presidential Immunity Claims Face Rejection in Appeals Court"

TL;DR Summary
Former President Trump's legal team argued that a president would be immune from prosecution, even if they directed SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political opponent, as long as they had not been impeached and convicted by the Senate. This argument was met with pushback from a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and the special counsel's team, who emphasized the need to hold presidents accountable for criminal actions. The debate also referenced Trump's second impeachment trial, where his attorneys argued that there was no need for censure as prosecutors could bring charges for any criminal conduct.
Topics:top-news#dc-circuit-court-of-appeals#impeachment#legal-arguments#politics#presidential-immunity#trump
- Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity The Hill
- Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on Donald Trump’s immunity claims CNN
- Judges “did not buy” Trump arguments on immunity MSNBC
- Opinion: Trump's attempt to intimidate a federal appeals court could ensure his defeat Yahoo News
- The coming Trump constitutional crisis — and how to avoid it The Hill
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
79%
471 → 100 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Hill