Trump's Gag Order Drama: Accusations, Fines, and Denials

Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested the revival of a partial gag order in the federal election interference case against Donald Trump, citing the former president's "threatening" social media posts about former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Smith's team argued that Trump's posts were intended to send a message to Meadows, a potential witness in the case. Trump's legal team is appealing the gag order, claiming it infringes on his First Amendment rights. Prosecutors argue that without the order, Trump's disparaging language poses a real danger. Trump is also facing multiple other legal cases, including allegations of hush-money payments, document hoarding, and election subversion.
- Jack Smith accuses Trump of 'threatening' Mark Meadows — asks for gag order to be revived New York Post
- Judge defends fining Trump $10,000 for breaking gag order CNN
- Judge denies Trump team's requests for immediate verdict in fraud trial after Cohen testimony Fox News
- Judges Need to Make Clear to Trump: Gag Orders Aren't Optional The Daily Beast
- Opinion | How the Trump Gag Orders Could Backfire POLITICO
Reading Insights
0
0
5 min
vs 6 min read
90%
1,082 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on New York Post