Federal Prosecutors Argue Against Trump's Immunity Claims in Election Case

Federal prosecutors have rejected former President Donald Trump's claims of "absolute immunity" from criminal prosecution in the case charging him with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election. The prosecutors argued that Trump's bid for immunity was unsupported by the Constitution, legal precedent, and the principle that no one is above the law. They emphasized that Trump, like any other American, is subject to federal criminal laws. The prosecutors' response was a direct rebuttal to Trump's attempt to have the charges dismissed before trial. Trump's lawyers had argued that the charges were actually efforts to uphold his duty to ensure election integrity. The immunity defense is the first of several motions expected to be filed by Trump's legal team.
- Federal Prosecutors Reject Trump's Immunity Claims in Election Case The New York Times
- Trump is 'not above the law,' prosecutors say in urging judge to let federal election case proceed Yahoo News
- Special counsel says Trump isn't entitled to immunity in 2020 election case as former president seeks dismissal CNN
- Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution defies American history, special counsel argues POLITICO
- Trump is not "above the law" and should not receive blanket immunity, DOJ says NPR
Reading Insights
0
0
4 min
vs 5 min read
86%
855 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times