Experts dismiss plan to seize elections under a national emergency

TL;DR Summary
A Florida lawyer's memo arguing the president could use the National Emergencies Act and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare a national emergency and seize U.S. elections was ridiculed by legal experts, who say IEEPA targets foreign threats and economic actions, not elections run by the states. The plan would not authorize seizing voting machines or mail ballots, conflicts with the Elections Clause, and rests on flawed readings of Youngstown, making it legally flawed and unconstitutional.
- Read the laughable legal memo behind the claim that Trump can declare a national voting emergency Democracy Docket
- Trump, seeking executive power over elections, is urged to declare emergency The Washington Post
- Pro-Trump lawyers push president for emergency order to expand his power ahead of midterm elections: reports The Independent
- Trump could declare national emergency over ‘Chinese election interference’ The Telegraph
- Former DOJ Lawyer Dismantles Trump’s ‘Madcap’ Scheme To Take Over Elections: ‘He Can’t Legally Do It’ Yahoo
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
4
Time Saved
7 min
vs 8 min read
Condensed
95%
1,441 → 78 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Democracy Docket