Legal Battle Unveiled: Jack Smith Challenges Judge Cannon's Rulings in Trump Documents Case

TL;DR Summary
Special Counsel Jack Smith has traced the origin of a legal theory used in Donald Trump's defense, revealing how it moved from conservative activist Tom Fitton to federal judge Aileen M. Cannon. The theory claims Trump was justified in keeping classified documents as "personal," but prosecutors argue that Trump never formally asserted this and deride it as a post hoc legal invention. The DOJ's extensive investigation has delved into Trump's private advisers and aims to prevent Judge Cannon from adopting this defense, which could potentially help Trump escape criminal charges related to hoarding classified records at Mar-a-Lago.
Topics:top-news#doj-investigation#jack-smith#judge-cannon#legalcourt-news#presidential-records-act#trump
- Jack Smith Tracks Unhinged Origin of Judge Cannon's Latest Trump Defense The Daily Beast
- How legal fights and stalling by judge could push Trump documents trial after election CNN
- Prosecutors in Trump's classified documents case sharply rebuke judge's unusual and 'flawed' order The Associated Press
- Jack Smith destroys Judge Aileen Cannon’s jury instructions order in Trump’s documents case MSNBC
- Trump legal news brief: Jack Smith threatens Judge Cannon with 'writ of mandamus.' Here's what that means. Yahoo! Voices
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
6 min
vs 7 min read
Condensed
93%
1,305 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Daily Beast