Supreme Court favors Jack Daniel's in dog toy trademark dispute.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment does not protect a dog toy resembling a bottle of Jack Daniel's from a lawsuit claiming trademark infringement. The toy, the Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker, has the shape and other distinctive features of a bottle of Jack Daniel's but with "lighthearted, dog-related alterations." The court unanimously ruled that the infringement claim rises or falls on the likelihood of confusion, and the chew toy's mockery of the liquor bottle had to figure in the analysis.
- Supreme Court Rules Against Dog Toy Resembling Liquor Bottle The New York Times
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel’s in trademark dispute involving a poop-themed dog toy CNN
- U.S. Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel's in fight over parody dog toy Yahoo Finance
- Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniel's in trademark dispute with dog toy maker NPR
- Supreme Court rules for Jack Daniel’s in ‘poop-themed’ dog toy trademark fight NBC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
874 → 84 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times