Supreme Court favors Jack Daniel's in dog toy trademark dispute.

1 min read
Source: The New York Times
Supreme Court favors Jack Daniel's in dog toy trademark dispute.
Photo: The New York Times
TL;DR Summary

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment does not protect a dog toy resembling a bottle of Jack Daniel's from a lawsuit claiming trademark infringement. The toy, the Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker, has the shape and other distinctive features of a bottle of Jack Daniel's but with "lighthearted, dog-related alterations." The court unanimously ruled that the infringement claim rises or falls on the likelihood of confusion, and the chew toy's mockery of the liquor bottle had to figure in the analysis.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

0

Time Saved

4 min

vs 5 min read

Condensed

90%

87484 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The New York Times