"Supreme Court's Rulings on Public Officials' Social Media Blockings"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court ruled that public officials can block people on social media in certain circumstances, setting a clearer standard for when they are considered state actors online. The cases involved elected school board members in California and a city manager in Michigan who blocked critics on their personal social media accounts. The court's unanimous opinion, written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, clarified that government officials' speech on social media can be subject to First Amendment scrutiny if they have the authority to speak on the state's behalf and purported to be exercising that authority.
Topics:top-news#first-amendment#free-speech#law-and-politics#public-officials#social-media#supreme-court
- Supreme Court rules that public officials can block social media followers in some circumstances CNN
- U.S. Supreme Court sets test in case of Michigan official deleting Facebook comments Detroit News
- Public officials can be held liable for blocking critics on social media SCOTUSblog
- Supreme Court tosses rulings on public officials’ social media blockings The Hill
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
88%
789 → 95 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN