Supreme Court's Potential Impact on SEC and Financial Fraud Watchdog Powers

TL;DR Summary
The conservative justices of the U.S. Supreme Court expressed skepticism towards the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) in-house enforcement proceedings, which aim to maintain the integrity of securities markets. The case brought by George Jarkesy challenges the SEC's actions, arguing that he should have had a trial in federal court with a jury. The justices focused on the contention that the SEC's fact-finding process violated Jarkesy's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. The case is part of a broader effort to dismantle what some conservatives call "the administrative state."
Topics:top-news#administrative-state#constitutional-challenges#enforcement-powers#law-and-politics#sec#supreme-court
- Supreme Court conservatives seem likely to axe SEC enforcement powers NPR
- The Supreme Court seems likely to rule that hedge fund managers have more rights than workers Vox.com
- Supreme Court seems poised to limit power of financial fraud watchdog CNN
- The SEC Might Lose Its Courts Bloomberg
- Trump wants to end the administrative state. SCOTUS seems less inclined. MSNBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
87%
684 → 90 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NPR