Supreme Court's Potential Blow to SEC's Power and Trump's Administrative State Agenda

The Supreme Court is signaling support for a hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, who claims that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) violated his constitutional rights by using in-house judges instead of a jury to decide if he broke the law. This case has broader implications for the government's ability to enforce regulations and weaken the "administrative state." The conservative justices expressed skepticism towards the Biden administration's argument that securities fraud enforcement falls under the executive branch's enforcement role. The liberal justices were more sympathetic to the government's position. The decision, along with other cases before the court, is expected to be decided in the middle of next year's presidential election.
- Supreme Court leans toward hedge fund manager seeking to weaken SEC USA TODAY
- Supreme Court conservatives seem likely to axe SEC enforcement powers NPR
- Supreme Court seems poised to limit power of financial fraud watchdog CNN
- The SEC May Have Gone Too Far. The Supreme Court Shouldn't. Bloomberg
- Trump wants to end the administrative state. SCOTUS seems less inclined. MSNBC
Reading Insights
0
1
4 min
vs 5 min read
87%
875 → 111 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on USA TODAY