"Supreme Court's Scrutiny of Jan. 6 Prosecutions Raises Concerns for Biden Administration"

The U.S. Supreme Court appeared divided on the use of a statute to prosecute Jan. 6 rioters, with conservatives expressing skepticism about its broad application. The statute in question makes it a crime to obstruct or impede an official proceeding, and the court's liberal justices suggested it was intended to fill gaps in existing obstruction laws. The conservative justices questioned the government's broad interpretation of the statute, raising concerns about its potential application to other protests and disruptions. The outcome of the case could impact the prosecution of over 350 individuals charged with obstruction related to the Capitol riot, and may also have implications for charges against Donald Trump in a separate election obstruction case.
- Supreme Court gives skeptical eye to key statute used to prosecute Jan. 6 rioters NPR
- Legal experts say Biden admin's legal theory in Jan 6 prosecution 'on the ropes' after Supreme Court argument Fox News
- Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters CNN
- The Supreme Court wants to hand a victory to January 6 insurrectionists Vox.com
- The Supreme Court's conservatives just took direct aim at Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump. Slate
Reading Insights
0
0
5 min
vs 6 min read
89%
1,083 → 115 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NPR