Supreme Court's 'and' interpretation could reshape drug traffickers' sentences

The Supreme Court is set to interpret the word "and" in a provision of the bipartisan 2018 criminal justice overhaul, known as the First Step Act, which aims to reduce mandatory minimum sentences for low-level, nonviolent drug dealers who cooperate with prosecutors. The interpretation of "and" will determine whether all three conditions listed in the provision must apply for a longer sentence to be imposed or if just one condition is enough. The decision could affect the sentences of nearly 6,000 drug traffickers in the 2021 budget year alone and potentially over 10,000 people sentenced since the law took effect. The case, Pulsifer v. U.S., will have significant implications for the application of the safety valve provision and the discretion of judges in sentencing.
- Six thousand drug traffickers' sentences hinge on Supreme Court's interpretation of 'and' NBC News
- The Supreme Court hears a civil rights case straight out of a right-wing fever dream Vox.com
- The Supreme Court will hear a case with a lot of 'buts' & 'ifs' over the meaning of 'and' The Associated Press
- The Supreme Court will hear a case with a lot of 'buts' & 'ifs' over the meaning of 'and' Yahoo News
- Supreme Court's interpretation of the word "and" could affect thousands of prison sentences each year CBS News
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
1
4 min
vs 5 min read
85%
851 → 124 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NBC News