Supreme Court Upholds South Carolina Voting Map, Clarence Thomas Criticizes Brown v. Board
TL;DR Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a South Carolina congressional map deemed racially gerrymandered, making it harder to challenge unjust voting maps. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion, argued that federal courts should not intervene in redistricting, criticizing past judicial actions like Brown v. Board of Education for overstepping judicial power.
Topics:nation#brown-v-board-of-education#clarence-thomas#racial-gerrymandering#redistricting#supreme-court#us-supreme-court
- Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Swats at Brown v. Board in Racial Redistricting Ruling The Daily Beast
- Clarence Thomas attacks Brown v. Board ruling in South Carolina voting map opinion Axios
- Supreme Court Sides With Republicans Over South Carolina Voting Map The New York Times
- Supreme Court rejects claim that South Carolina's congressional map was racially gerrymandered POLITICO
- Supreme Court Restores White-Dominated Congressional Voting District in South Carolina The Wall Street Journal
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
75%
206 → 51 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Daily Beast