Supreme Court Avoids Ruling on Internet Liability Shield and Protects Social Media Giants.

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court has declined to rule on whether YouTube can invoke a federal law that shields internet platforms from legal responsibility for what their users post in a case brought by the family of a woman killed in a terrorist attack. Instead, the court decided that a different law, one allowing suits for “knowingly providing substantial assistance” to terrorists, generally did not apply to tech platforms in the first place. The court’s unanimous decision in the Twitter v. Taamneh case effectively resolved both cases and allowed the justices to avoid difficult questions about the scope of the 1996 law, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
- Supreme Court Sidesteps Ruling on Scope of Internet Liability Shield The New York Times
- Supreme Court rules for social media giants in cases over third-party content, declines to address Section 230 Fox Business
- Supreme Court shields Twitter from liability for terror-related content and leaves Section 230 untouched CNN
- Supreme Court sides with Google and Twitter, avoids Section 230 ruling The Washington Post
- Supreme Court ruling continues to protect Google, Facebook and Twitter from what users post CNBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
84%
692 → 108 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times