Supreme Court Faces Controversy Over LGBTQ+ Conversion Therapy and Expertise
TL;DR Summary
The article discusses the controversial practice of conversion therapy within the Catholic context, highlighting personal stories like Simon Fung's failed attempt to change his sexual orientation, the evolving professional and legal debates surrounding the practice, and the differing perspectives among Catholic and mental health professionals on its efficacy and ethical implications, especially in light of ongoing legal cases like Chiles v. Salazar.
Topics:nation#catholic#conversion-therapy#mental-health#religion-and-law#sexual-orientation#supreme-court
- 'The devil is in the details' - The Catholic debate over conversion therapy The Pillar
- Conservative justices reveal their distrust of medical expertise on LGBTQ+ issues CNN
- Supreme Court skeptical of state bans on conversion therapy aimed at LGBTQ kids NBC News
- With One Damning Question, Ketanji Brown Jackson Defined the Supreme Court’s New Term Slate
- Christian group ‘deceived’ supreme court about LGBTQ+ research, cited scholars say The Guardian
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
17 min
vs 18 min read
Condensed
98%
3,504 → 62 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Pillar