Watergate prosecutor refutes Rep. Jim Jordan's defense of Trump using 1988 Navy v. Egan case
TL;DR Summary
A former Watergate prosecutor, Carrie Cordero, has refuted Rep. Jim Jordan's argument for former President Donald Trump's innocence based on the 1988 Navy v. Egan court case. Cordero stated that the case was not applicable to Trump's situation and that the former president's executive privilege claim was not absolute.
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
85%
326 → 49 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN