Trump Administration Defends Minnesota ICE Surge as Lawful Enforcement, Not Coercion
TL;DR Summary
Trump administration lawyers argued in court that the Minnesota ICE surge is a legitimate enforcement action enforcing federal law, not an attempt to coerce policy, as a federal judge weighs blocking the operation amid thousands of arrests, shootings, and protests; Minnesota officials say it violates state sovereignty under the 10th Amendment.
- Trump Administration Denies That Coercion Is at Heart of Minnesota ICE Surge The New York Times
- Minnesota ICE Live Updates: Omar Attack, Alex Pretti Shooting and Noem Impeachment Calls The New York Times
- Trump has a new problem in Minneapolis — a GOP-appointed judge CNN
- Judge slams ICE while backing off contempt threat for agency’s director The Washington Post
- Trump administration releases Minnesota detainee after judge threatens to hold acting ICE director in contempt NBC News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
13
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
80%
258 → 51 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times