The Partisan Divide in Addressing Supreme Court Ethics

Democratic lawmakers have recently criticized conservative Supreme Court justices over ethical matters, particularly Justice Clarence Thomas, who allegedly received gifts from a Republican mega-donor and failed to report them. However, Democrats have overlooked issues involving liberal justices in the past, including proximity to Democratic mega-donors, omitting trips and reimbursements, failing to recuse themselves from cases involving companies in which they had financial stakes, and cases concerning issues they had worked on in the past. Retired Justice Stephen Breyer, who maintained close ties to the wealthy Chicago-based Pritzker family, took more trips than any other Supreme Court justice from 2004 to 2018, many of which were supported by the Pritzker family, known for their generous contributions to Democratic causes.
- Democrats attack conservative Supreme Court justices but have long ignored liberal justices' ethical issues Fox News
- Top Senate Democrats push for new ethics rules in wake of Clarence Thomas report as Republicans defend justice CNN
- Can Congress do anything about SCOTUS ethics claims? Laura Jarrett weighs MSNBC
- Supreme Court justices need an ethics check Los Angeles Times
- Liberal Supreme Court justices shouldn’t let Clarence Thomas off the hook MSNBC
Reading Insights
0
0
8 min
vs 9 min read
93%
1,643 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Fox News