"Supreme Court Grapples with Internet Censorship, Disinformation, and First Amendment Challenges"

TL;DR Summary
The Biden administration's attempt to distract the Supreme Court from evidence of federal abuse of Americans' speech rights during oral arguments in Murthy v. Missouri is concerning. The government's coercion of third parties to suppress speech it dislikes is unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court should enforce constitutional boundaries on such actions. The administration's use of counterterrorism tools on its own citizens to control election outcomes is a violation of the First Amendment, and the Court must act to protect citizens' fundamental human rights.
- This Country Can't Afford A SCOTUS Weak On Internet Censorship The Federalist
- A Conspiracy Theory Goes to the Supreme Court: How Did Murthy v Missouri Get This Far? Just Security
- Supreme Court examines whether government can combat disinformation online NPR
- Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raises eyebrows with comment that First Amendment 'hamstrings' government Fox News
- The Supreme Court's conservatives are annoyed at the 5th Circuit. Slate
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
6
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
95%
1,675 → 83 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Federalist