Mirabelli v. Bonta reveals the Supreme Court’s dangerous expansion of judicial power

Vox’s Ian Millhiser argues that Mirabelli v. Bonta marks a dangerous expansion of judicial power by grounding a California public-education policy in substantive due process, effectively forcing teachers to disclose a student’s gender identity to parents even if the student wishes to keep it private. He warns that substantive due process has repeatedly been used to rewrite law from Lochner to Roe, calling it a “One Ring” that tempts justices to impose personal preferences. The piece also suggests the ruling could create unworkable obligations for schools and threaten public education, while highlighting concerns about religious liberty and the cyclical nature of Court power.
- The Supreme Court’s Republicans just seized the most dangerous power in constitutional law vox.com
- Supreme Court ruling on secretive California gender policy could reshape parent rights fights nationwide Fox News
- Supreme Court blocks California policies intended to protect transgender students CNN
- Supreme Court Sides With Religious Parents, Blocking California’s Trans Student Policy The New York Times
- Supreme Court sides with parents in lawsuit over California’s ban on ‘forced outing’ of students Politico
Reading Insights
0
2
35 min
vs 36 min read
99%
7,085 → 103 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on vox.com