Federal Appeals Court Narrows Trump Gag Order in Election Subversion Case

A US appeals court has narrowed but largely upheld a gag order that prevents former President Donald Trump from criticizing prosecutors, court staff, and potential witnesses in a federal criminal case accusing him of illegally trying to overturn the 2020 election. The court lifted the prohibition on Trump personally criticizing Special Counsel Jack Smith but maintained restrictions on comments about witnesses' involvement in the investigation and potential testimony. The court found that while some aspects of Trump's public statements pose a threat to the ongoing criminal proceeding, the initial gag order went beyond what was necessary. Trump plans to appeal the ruling to the US Supreme Court. The case is set to go to trial in March 2024.
- US appeals court narrows Trump gag order in federal 2020 election case Reuters
- Appeals court partially upholds Trump gag order in election interference case MSNBC
- Appeals court maintains most of Trump gag order in federal election subversion case CNN
- Key aspects of Trump gag order upheld by federal appeals court Fox News
- Appeals Court Upholds, but Narrows, Gag Order on Trump in Election Case The New York Times
Reading Insights
0
0
2 min
vs 3 min read
79%
561 → 118 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Reuters