DOJ defends Halligan's U.S. attorney status amid court clash over appointment validity

TL;DR Summary
DOJ lawyers defended Lindsey Halligan’s continued use of the U.S. attorney title after a judge ruled her interim appointment invalid, arguing the Currie decision doesn’t bar her from all duties and blasting the demand for justification as an abuse of power; Novak ordered Halligan to explain why she uses the title, while Currie previously held the appointment violated the Appointments Clause and voided indictments related to James Comey and Letitia James, highlighting a high-stakes dispute over appointment authority in Virginia’s Eastern District.
- Lindsey Halligan argues she should still be U.S. attorney, accuses judge of abuse of power CBS News
- Trump Loyalist Asserts She Can Keep U.S. Attorney Title The New York Times
- Ordered to explain herself, Lindsey Halligan invokes Jack Smith MS NOW
- Judge's questioning of Lindsey Halligan's role draws DOJ rebuke NBC News
- Justice Department slams Trump-appointed judge for questioning Lindsey Halligan’s authority CNN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
91%
890 → 82 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CBS News