Clarence Thomas and the Ethics of Undisclosed Money

TL;DR Summary
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is facing renewed scrutiny following the revelation that he sold his childhood home to GOP mega-donor Harlan Crow and never disclosed the sale. While some experts are calling for his resignation or impeachment, others say there is little chance of that happening due to the lack of regulatory oversight and disciplinary measures for Supreme Court justices. However, the controversies may lead to internal policing and behavioral changes within the top court, including the adoption of a code of ethics or subjecting itself to the existing code of ethics that applies to other judges.
- Sorry everyone, but Clarence Thomas can take undisclosed money from whomever he wants and there is little to be done about it Yahoo News
- Joyce Vance talks Clarence Thomas ProPublica report and Evan Corcoran recusal MSNBC
- Latest Clarence Thomas scandal may be too big to blow over MSNBC
- Opinion | Clarence Thomas should be required to follow the disclosure law The Washington Post
- 'Regular stock' Clarence Thomas, living on billionaire dole Los Angeles Times
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
89%
906 → 98 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Yahoo News