An old white-supremacist idea haunts Trump's birthright citizenship case

TL;DR Summary
Vox traces Trump’s birthright-citizenship challenge to a 19th‑century white supremacist argument popularized by lawyer Alexander Morse, who argued that citizenship should be denied to the children of foreigners transiently in the U.S. and, in practice, to Chinese Americans. Morse later abandoned the approach, and Wong Kim Ark settled the Citizenship Clause, but Trump’s brief echoes that old theory even as the constitutional text and Wong Kim Ark undermine it; the legal case against birthright citizenship remains strong.
Topics:nation#birthright-citizenship#fourteenth-amendment#immigration#politics#white-supremacy#wong-kim-ark
- The ugly history behind Trump’s birthright citizenship case in the Supreme Court Vox
- Springsteen's 'Born in the U.S.A.' joins Trump citizenship court fight USA Today
- Bruce Springsteen Teams Up With the ACLU for 'Born in the U.S.A.' Birthright-Citizenship Video Rolling Stone
- The Case That Could Upend Who Gets to Be an American Is Back at the Supreme Court Mother Jones
- The line even the Know Nothings didn’t cross The Boston Globe
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
6
Time Saved
41 min
vs 42 min read
Condensed
99%
8,338 → 77 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox