Abortion pill access and disclosure controversies spark nationwide rallies.

TL;DR Summary
Matthew Kacsmaryk, a judge in Amarillo, Texas, is under scrutiny for submitting an article to a Texas law review in 2017 criticizing Obama-era protections for transgender people and those seeking abortions. Kacsmaryk had originally been listed as the article’s sole author but later removed his name and replaced it with those of two colleagues at his legal group, First Liberty Institute, without disclosing his role in the article. Kacsmaryk’s past statements on LGBT issues became a point of contention during his confirmation hearings. His recent ruling sought to block government approval of a key drug used in more than half of all abortions in the country.
Topics:nation#abortion#first-liberty-institute#judicial-nominee#lgbt-rights#matthew-kacsmaryk#politics
- The controversial article Matthew Kacsmaryk did not disclose to the Senate The Washington Post
- Rep. Barbara Lee: the effort to ban abortion pill is 'fundamentally undemocratic' MSNBC
- Across the country, abortion rights advocates rally in support of abortion pill access NPR
- The FDA has the power to protect abortion pills: It’s time to use it The Hill
- Editorial: The only thing certain about medication abortion is the confusion over how to get it Los Angeles Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
94%
1,693 → 106 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Washington Post