Supreme Court Revisits First Amendment and Social Media Blocking by Public Officials

The Supreme Court is set to hear a case that could have significant implications for how government officials interact with the public on social media. The case involves a city manager in Michigan who blocked a constituent from his Facebook page after the constituent criticized his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The question before the court is whether public officials' social media pages are considered part of their official capacity, and if blocking constituents violates the First Amendment. This case, along with others pending before the Supreme Court, highlights the intersection of social media and government and the need for clarity on the rights and responsibilities of public officials in the digital age.
- A First Amendment question raised by Trump returns to Supreme Court USA TODAY
- The Supreme Court takes up social media cases similar to one about Donald Trump's Twitter feed The Washington Post
- Supreme Court to weigh fights over public officials blocking constituents on social media CBS News
- Does the First Amendment allow public officials to 'block' their critics online? The Supreme Court will soon decide. Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
0
1
5 min
vs 6 min read
90%
1,109 → 113 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on USA TODAY