"Supreme Court Divided Over Trump-Era Bump Stock Ban"

The Supreme Court is divided over the federal ban on bump stocks, with justices expressing confusion and differing opinions on whether the government has the authority to prohibit these devices that increase the firepower of semi-automatic weapons. The case, Garland v. Cargill, revolves around whether bump stocks qualify as "machine guns" under federal law. The court's questions focused on the technical aspects of bump stocks and their functional effect, with both sides presenting contrasting views. The case raises concerns about regulatory authority, expanded gun rights, and the government's power to impose bans without congressional action. A ruling is expected by early summer.